Before
“AI should be allowed because it makes students productive.”
What’s missing
The claim is clear, but the assumptions beneath it have not been tested.
ThinkCourt helps you examine claims, test evidence, and challenge your own ideas before reaching a conclusion.
No answers to copy. Just better thinking.
Reasoning Court
Foundation
Your claim
“AI should be allowed in university coursework because it makes students more productive.”
Guiding Question
What would need to be true for greater productivity to also mean deeper learning?
The practice
ThinkCourt reveals the reasoning behind your beliefs—then helps you strengthen it.
Before
“AI should be allowed because it makes students productive.”
What’s missing
The claim is clear, but the assumptions beneath it have not been tested.
After examination
“AI may support coursework when assignments still require students to demonstrate independent understanding.”
Assumption examined
Productivity and learning are not automatically the same outcome.
How ThinkCourt helps
Start with the thought you already have. The work stays yours.
Learn to distinguish examples from evidence that truly supports a conclusion.
Meet a fair challenge, then choose whether to defend, qualify, or revise your view.
See the method in motion
Bring a claim. Leave with a stronger argument.
Start a sessionExample: AI in coursework
A five-minute reasoning practice
Foundation
Clarify the claim beneath the opinion.
Evidence
Test whether the support reaches the conclusion.
Challenge
Consider the strongest reasonable objection.
Reflection
Name what changed and what you need to know next.
The result
A stronger position—and a clearer next question to explore.